"T1595" alone is opaque; "T1595 — Active Scanning" tells you the
story at a glance. The names come from a backend-side static catalogue
pinned to the same ATT&CK release as the rule engine
(_ATTACK_RELEASE = "v15.1") — names are the canonical MITRE labels,
not author-supplied strings on rules, so a rule author can't typo a
name and the entire fleet sees the typo.
- New `decnet/ttp/attack_catalog.py` with `TECHNIQUE_NAMES` covering
every technique_id + sub_technique_id emitted by `rules/ttp/`
(R0001..R0058 → 69 IDs in the v0 pack).
- `IdentityTechniqueRow` / `TechniqueRollupRow` / `CampaignTechniqueRow`
/ `TTPTagDetailRow` gain optional `technique_name` /
`sub_technique_name` fields. Repo + router populate them from the
catalogue at row-construction time. None when an ID isn't in the
catalogue — UI falls back to the bare ID.
- Coverage test (`tests/ttp/test_attack_catalog.py`) walks every
YAML rule and asserts every emitted ID has a catalogue entry, so
a future rule author who forgets to update the catalogue gets a
loud failure rather than a silent UI fallback.
Frontend:
- `TTPsObservedSection` shows "T1595.002 — Active Scanning:
Vulnerability Scanning" instead of just the ID, with overflow
ellipsis + tooltip for narrow viewports. Inspector header /
TECHNIQUE row also surface the names.
anti
84699f89da