The inspector was dumping the whole `CMD uid=0 user=root src=… pwd=…
cmd=nmap -p- 192.168.1.0/24` syslog body into a single ``command_text``
blob. ANTI: "I'd like to separate the fields." Done — three layers
work together:
1. Collector session aggregator: new `_parse_cmd_msg` splits the bash
PROMPT_COMMAND msg into `{uid, user, src, pwd, command}`. The
session-ended envelope's per-command dict now carries the
structured fields, with `command_text` set to just the cmd= value
(preserving embedded whitespace — `nmap -p- 1.2.3.0/24` etc.).
2. Rule engine: per-source_kind auxiliary evidence list
(`_AUX_EVIDENCE_FIELDS`). For `command` events the engine
automatically promotes uid/user/src/pwd into the persisted
`evidence` dict on top of the rule's explicit `evidence_fields`.
Engine-controlled, not per-rule — adding a new aux field is one
line here, not a 30-rule YAML sweep, and rule authors can't
accidentally drop it.
3. TTPInspector frontend: evidence renders as a structured
`kvs` grid (UID / USER / SRC / PWD / CMD rows) instead of
pretty-printed JSON. Primary-order list keeps shell fields at
the top; everything else falls below alphabetically so unfamiliar
evidence shapes still surface predictably.
Tests:
- session_aggregator pins the structured-fields emit (uid/user/src/
pwd/command_text without "CMD" prefix, embedded whitespace
preserved).
- rule_engine_tagger pins the aux-field auto-promotion + the
no-`None`-leakage path when payload doesn't carry an aux key.
"T1595" alone is opaque; "T1595 — Active Scanning" tells you the
story at a glance. The names come from a backend-side static catalogue
pinned to the same ATT&CK release as the rule engine
(_ATTACK_RELEASE = "v15.1") — names are the canonical MITRE labels,
not author-supplied strings on rules, so a rule author can't typo a
name and the entire fleet sees the typo.
- New `decnet/ttp/attack_catalog.py` with `TECHNIQUE_NAMES` covering
every technique_id + sub_technique_id emitted by `rules/ttp/`
(R0001..R0058 → 69 IDs in the v0 pack).
- `IdentityTechniqueRow` / `TechniqueRollupRow` / `CampaignTechniqueRow`
/ `TTPTagDetailRow` gain optional `technique_name` /
`sub_technique_name` fields. Repo + router populate them from the
catalogue at row-construction time. None when an ID isn't in the
catalogue — UI falls back to the bare ID.
- Coverage test (`tests/ttp/test_attack_catalog.py`) walks every
YAML rule and asserts every emitted ID has a catalogue entry, so
a future rule author who forgets to update the catalogue gets a
loud failure rather than a silent UI fallback.
Frontend:
- `TTPsObservedSection` shows "T1595.002 — Active Scanning:
Vulnerability Scanning" instead of just the ID, with overflow
ellipsis + tooltip for narrow viewports. Inspector header /
TECHNIQUE row also surface the names.
The TTPsObservedSection rollup tells the operator "we saw T1059" but
not why. Click any technique row → side drawer opens listing every
ttp_tag row in scope with the persisted evidence JSON, firing
rule_id / rule_version, source_kind / source_id, confidence, and
created_at. Mirrors the CredentialReuseInspector / BountyInspector
pattern (drawer-backdrop + bd-head/bd-body + kvs grid).
Backend:
- New `GET /api/v1/ttp/tags/by-{scope}/{uuid}/{technique_id}`
(`scope ∈ {identity, attacker, session}`, optional
`?sub_technique_id=`, `?limit=` capped to 1000). Returns raw
TTPTag rows newest-first.
- New `TTPTagDetailRow` Pydantic model + re-export.
- New repo method `list_tags_by_scope_and_technique` on
TTPMixin (+ abstract on BaseRepository) — single query branched
on scope; identity scope projects through `Attacker.identity_id`
the same way `list_techniques_by_identity` does.
- Tests: evidence round-trips, sub_technique filter, JWT-required,
empty scope, unknown scope rejected.
Frontend:
- New `TTPInspector.tsx` + `TTPInspector.css` (violet accent, slide
animation, focus-trapped panel matching the existing inspector
family).
- `TTPsObservedSection`'s TechniqueBar is now click+keyboard
activatable; clicking opens the inspector for that
(technique, sub_technique) tuple.
mypy clean. 532 passed in the targeted sweep.
