Three bug classes uncovered by the 2026-05-02 ship-time audit:
* AbuseIPDB code/name mismatch in v1: cat 10 was treated as DDoS (it's
Web Spam — DDoS is cat 4, intentionally unmapped per A.10) and cat 17
as VPN IP (it's Spoofing — VPN IP is cat 13). Both typos mirrored in
code AND the design doc Appendix A.10. Code now matches the AbuseIPDB
taxonomy exactly; cat 17 retargets to T1566 (email-spoofing as a
phishing precursor), and cats 7 (Phishing) and 16 (SQL Injection)
pick up T1566 / T1190 emissions that v1 didn't cover.
* ThreatFox dispatch keyed on `ioc_type` in v1, but `ioc_type` is the
indicator format (url / domain / hash variants) and carries no ATT&CK
signal. The canonical taxonomy field per ThreatFox's API is
`threat_type` (botnet_cc / payload_delivery / payload / cc_skimming).
Repoint dispatch through the new `threatfox_threat_types` payload
field; `ioc_type` rides as evidence only. Also adds the missing
cc_skimming -> T1056 (Input Capture) mapping and registers T1056 in
attack_catalog.py.
* GreyNoise bare-malicious lane: a `classification == "malicious"` row
with no recognised tag used to emit nothing. Now lights T1071 at a
half multiplier, suppressed when a tag already fires T1071 to avoid
double-stamping at conflicting confidence levels.
"T1595" alone is opaque; "T1595 — Active Scanning" tells you the
story at a glance. The names come from a backend-side static catalogue
pinned to the same ATT&CK release as the rule engine
(_ATTACK_RELEASE = "v15.1") — names are the canonical MITRE labels,
not author-supplied strings on rules, so a rule author can't typo a
name and the entire fleet sees the typo.
- New `decnet/ttp/attack_catalog.py` with `TECHNIQUE_NAMES` covering
every technique_id + sub_technique_id emitted by `rules/ttp/`
(R0001..R0058 → 69 IDs in the v0 pack).
- `IdentityTechniqueRow` / `TechniqueRollupRow` / `CampaignTechniqueRow`
/ `TTPTagDetailRow` gain optional `technique_name` /
`sub_technique_name` fields. Repo + router populate them from the
catalogue at row-construction time. None when an ID isn't in the
catalogue — UI falls back to the bare ID.
- Coverage test (`tests/ttp/test_attack_catalog.py`) walks every
YAML rule and asserts every emitted ID has a catalogue entry, so
a future rule author who forgets to update the catalogue gets a
loud failure rather than a silent UI fallback.
Frontend:
- `TTPsObservedSection` shows "T1595.002 — Active Scanning:
Vulnerability Scanning" instead of just the ID, with overflow
ellipsis + tooltip for narrow viewports. Inspector header /
TECHNIQUE row also surface the names.
