feat(attackers): scanned vs. interacted service bucketing on detail page
Adds a new card on AttackerDetail: SCANNED · N services | INTERACTED WITH · M services. Distinguishes port-scanners (N high, M=0) from actual engagement (M>0) at a glance — the analyst's first question when triaging a new attacker row. Classifier lives in decnet/correlation/event_kinds.py, a single source of truth for the event-type vocabulary: - INTERACTION_EVENT_TYPES — command-family (command/exec/query/...), SMTP engagement (mail_from/rcpt_to/message_accepted), file/payload activity (file_captured/upload/download_attempt/retr), pub/sub (publish/subscribe), recorded TTY sessions. - NOISE_EVENT_TYPES — DECNET-internal (startup/shutdown/parse_error/ unknown_*). - Everything else defaults to scan. Conservative by design: new template verbs show up as "scanned" until explicitly promoted. Bucket logic: a service is "interacted" if ≥1 of its events classifies as interaction; otherwise "scanned" if ≥1 scan event; noise-only services drop. Disjoint by construction. Deliberate no-schema path: compute on-the-fly in the detail endpoint via SELECT DISTINCT service, event_type FROM logs. Small result set (tens of pairs per attacker), cost is trivial vs. the existing behavior/commands queries. Trade-off: one more DB round-trip per detail view in exchange for zero ALTER TABLE migration pain and immediate classifier-change feedback loop. Profiler's _COMMAND_EVENT_TYPES stays as-is (strict subset of interactions that carry executable text), with a comment pointing at the new canonical module. Closes DEVELOPMENT.md "Attacker Intelligence §Service-Level Behavioral Profiling — Services actively interacted with".
This commit is contained in:
@@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ interface AttackerData {
|
||||
country_source: string | null;
|
||||
updated_at: string;
|
||||
behavior: AttackerBehavior | null;
|
||||
service_activity?: {
|
||||
interacted: string[];
|
||||
scanned: string[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ─── Fingerprint rendering ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
@@ -944,6 +948,40 @@ const AttackerDetail: React.FC = () => {
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
{/* Scanned vs. Interacted — activity-depth signal */}
|
||||
{attacker.service_activity &&
|
||||
(attacker.service_activity.scanned.length > 0 ||
|
||||
attacker.service_activity.interacted.length > 0) && (
|
||||
<div className="stats-grid" style={{ gridTemplateColumns: 'repeat(2, 1fr)' }}>
|
||||
<div
|
||||
className="stat-card"
|
||||
title={
|
||||
attacker.service_activity.scanned.length > 0
|
||||
? `Services: ${attacker.service_activity.scanned.join(', ')}`
|
||||
: 'No services were scanned without engagement.'
|
||||
}
|
||||
>
|
||||
<div className="stat-value matrix-text">
|
||||
{attacker.service_activity.scanned.length}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div className="stat-label">SCANNED · SERVICES</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div
|
||||
className="stat-card"
|
||||
title={
|
||||
attacker.service_activity.interacted.length > 0
|
||||
? `Services: ${attacker.service_activity.interacted.join(', ')}`
|
||||
: 'No services were interacted with — scan-only attacker.'
|
||||
}
|
||||
>
|
||||
<div className="stat-value violet-accent">
|
||||
{attacker.service_activity.interacted.length}
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div className="stat-label">INTERACTED WITH · SERVICES</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
)}
|
||||
|
||||
{/* Timestamps */}
|
||||
<Section title="TIMELINE" open={openSections.timeline} onToggle={() => toggle('timeline')}>
|
||||
<div style={{ padding: '16px', display: 'flex', flexWrap: 'wrap', gap: '32px', fontSize: '0.85rem' }}>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user